In Aeschylus’ trilogy
The Oresteia, the character Clytaemnestra, the wife of
Agamemnon and mother of Orestes, has been called a strong woman
because she controls her emotions, gives commanding orders, and
“kicks butt.” However, I would argue, after reading several
psychology articles on the subject and reflecting on Scripture, that
Clytaemnestra is not a strong woman at all, but is, in fact, a
psychopath. We can see certain traits that Clytaemnestra has in
common with a psychopath throughout the first two books of Aeschylus’
trilogy, Agamemnon and The Libation Bearers. These
traits include the mastery of small talk, the constant manipulation
of her fellow human beings, and the lack of many genuine
emotions.
Clytaemnestra demonstrates great skill in making
small talk. In the play Agamemnon, she says to a newly arrived
captive from Troy, “Won’t you come inside? I mean you, Cassandra.
/ Zeus in all his mercy wants you to share / some victory libations
with the house” (Ag.,1032-1034). Later, in the play The
Libation Bearers, Clytaemnestra greets her son, whom she had
exiled as a baby, and his friends, saying: “Strangers, please, tell
me what you would like and it is yours … We have warm baths and
beds to charm away your pains / and the eyes of Justice look on all
we do” (Lib.,
650-653). This skill earns her the admiration of her people. They
praise her, saying, “my lady, loyal, full of self-command” (Ag.,
355-336) and “We’ve come, Clytaemnestra. We respect your power”
(Ag., 258-259). The leader of the Chorus says about
Clytaemnestra, “She speaks well, but it takes no seer to know she
only says what’s right” (Ag., 612-613). According to an
article published in Psychology Today by Amy Morin,
“Psychopaths are almost always well-liked. They come across as
delightful people great at making small talk.” As with
most psychopaths, Clytaemnestra’s words are not genuine, but tools
for manipulation.
Clytaemnestra repeatedly uses words in
attempts to persuade, fool, and manipulate other people in order to
achieve her will. “Words, endless words I’ve said to serve the
moment” (Ag., 1391). She cajoles the slave, Cassandra, to
get off the chariot because she wants to kill her inside the palace.
She says, “Down from the chariot, / this is no time for pride”
(Ag., 1038-1041). Clytaemnestra attempts to distract the
Chorus from her murderous intentions by making a show of love for the
husband whom she has been plotting to kill. She states, “I am not
ashamed to tell you / how I love the man…when a woman sits at home,
and the man is gone, / the loneliness is terrible … the rumors [of
Agamemnon’s death] broke like fever… they cut me down” (Ag.,
842-864). In an article by Joaquin Hagopian, published by Global
Research in 2014, he writes, “Psychopaths see others in terms
of how they can be conveniently and cunningly used … They have no
trouble putting on the act of emotions when they are determined to
manipulate others, most often into feeling guilty or sympathetic
toward them.” Clytaemnestra uses displays of emotion to
attain her will but does not show any genuine emotion except for
anger.
Clytaemnestra acts calm and even silly in the face
of calamity and only shows anger when circumstances block her
desires. When Clytemnestra’s servant rushes up and down the halls
of her palace shouting a harrowing message that Clytaemnestra can’t
understand, she says, “Ah, a riddle, I do well at riddles” (Lib.,
874). When it is revealed that the servant was screaming about the
death of Aegisthus, Clytaemnestra’s lover, she merely remarks,
“Gone, my violent one—Aegisthus, very dear” (Lib., 880). Even when
her own son is threatening to kill her, she handles this, too, with
irrational calmness, saying to her son, “Watch out—the hounds of
a mother’s curse will hunt you down” (Lib., 911). Her
reactions, lacking the normal emotional responses, do not match up
with these events. Joaquin Hagopian writes, “[Psychopaths] do not
feel fear, sadness, regret or disgust that the rest of us
experience.” According to the article, this lack of
emotion enables these psychopaths to remain calm under what most
would view as extremely stressful situations. However, Clytaemnestra
does display genuine anger when she does not get her way. She invites
Agamemnon to walk on tapestries to make a big show of his triumph
over Troy. Agamemnon disagrees, saying that walking on tapestries is
an honor “only the gods deserve” (Ag., 915), and continues
to argue with her. Finally, she shouts, “Oh give way! … Surrender
/ all of your own free will to me!” (Ag., 938-939) According
to Hagopian’s article, “the only genuine emotion psychopaths
express is anger whenever their manipulations are thwarted or
rebuffed.” So while her anger is genuine, it is not a
righteous anger.
Should being an expert at small talk to
get people to like you, manipulating people to do your will and
becoming angry when people won’t do your will be considered
evidence of strength? While some regard Clytemnestra as a role
model, a strong woman who makes tough decisions, I argue that she is
not. If we look to the one true role model of
strength—Jesus—Clytaemnestra is a sham. Jesus in fact behaved in
ways that are the opposite of Clytaemnestra’s behavior. Rather than
engage in small talk, Jesus emphasized the importance of what he was
saying by using phrases like, “Verily I say unto you,” or “Amen,
I say to you,” and the words he said were not always pleasing to
people. In fact, as Jesus was well aware, this led to many hating
Him. Jesus says in John 15:18, “If the world hates you, keep in
mind that it hated me first.” Jesus also never used his words to
manipulate anyone into obeying His will. In Revelation 3:20 we read,
“Behold, I stand at the door and knock; if anyone hears My voice
and opens the door, I will come into him and will dine with him, and
he with Me.” Jesus only offers his Way to us. Could it be that the
world’s conception of strength is askew? Webster’s Dictionary
defines strength as the “capacity for exertion or endurance.”
Isaiah 40:29 says our strength comes from somewhere else—“He
gives power to the weak and strength to the powerless.” The Apostle
Paul writes in his second letter to the Corinthians (12:10) that
“when I am weak, then I am strong.” Only when we rely fully on
God can we be truly strong. Jesus said, “Blessed are the meek: for
they shall inherit the earth” (Matthew 5:5). Perhaps we can find
our role model of a strong woman in the person of Jesus’ mother
Mary, who showed true strength when she surrendered her life to God,
saying in Luke 1:38, “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it
be done to me according to your word." What was Mary’s advice
on how to be strong? Mary said, “Do whatever He tells you” (John
2:5).
Hey AJ! This was quite the interesting read! You bring up some very good points and honestly, who would be surprised if Clytemnestra was a psychopath? I sure wouldn’t. I’ve never heard anyone say she is a good role model, and if people really think that, that is kind of scary. She is a violent women. She brutally killed her own husband simply so she could continue to rule. This is definitely a sign of psychopathy. However, in our class we also had a theory that she is partly upset about her husband sacrificing her daughter, which would debunk this theory since she actually cares about someone besides herself. There is not much proof of that though, so I think this is a pretty solid theory.
ReplyDeleteHeya Kaylin! Thanks for your comment! It is definitely scary to me that people praise, admire and defend Clytemnestra (maybe I was going a little overboard to say that they see her as a role model, lol this was a really emotional essay). Thanks again for reading!
ReplyDeleteHoly Cow AJ! This essay was so intriguing and I have to commend you on your amazing writing! While I agree that Clytaemnestra should never be considered a likable character and she does have psychopathic tendencies. In my own person opinion, she is more of a sociopath. As mentioned in your essay, you mention psychopaths have the symptoms of lack of empathy and the power of manipulation(which I am not saying they do not), but so do sociopaths. Even if the murder of her husband did put her on the spectrum for being a maniac, I do not think she is so insane to be a psychopath.
ReplyDeleteHeya Nikki! Thanks for reading, glad you liked it! Sociopath may definitely be a better term to describe Clytemnestra. I am not a psychologist by any stretch, lol! Thanks again for your comment!
DeleteI really enjoyed reading this essay. You did a good job writing this out and supporting your point. I agree with you that Clytaemnestra could be a psychopath, however is it really her fault? It seems to me that she was defending her moral code and doing what she saw was right. While I know it is wrong to go on a killing spree to prove your point, is it not good to be strong in your beliefs? While we shouldn't model ourselves after a psychotic murderer, we should at least acknowledge that she was a strong character who did what it took to achieve her goals.
ReplyDelete